500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

GIRLS PREP CHARTER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

144
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

53

16%

LEVEL 2

135

41%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

39

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

137

39%

LEVEL 3

101

29%

LEVEL 4

44

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

4

67%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

69
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

69

43%

LEVEL 3

56

35%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

57
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

22

14%

LEVEL 2

75

49%

LEVEL 3

44

29%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

66
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

55

37%

LEVEL 3

44

30%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

76
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

27

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

99

36%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

29

10%

LEVEL 2

118

41%

LEVEL 3

94

33%

LEVEL 4

44

15%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

25

45%

LEVEL 2

24

43%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

36

58%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

143
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

134

41%

LEVEL 3

105

32%

LEVEL 4

38

12%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

24

39%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

31

37%

LEVEL 3

28

34%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

81

30%

LEVEL 4

31

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

73

28%

LEVEL 4

34

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.