500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHARTER SCH-EDUC EXCELLENCE GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

178

45%

LEVEL 3

128

32%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

166

38%

LEVEL 4

72

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

91
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

21

10%

LEVEL 2

89

44%

LEVEL 3

69

34%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

127
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

12

6%

LEVEL 2

78

36%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

31

16%

LEVEL 2

89

46%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

111
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

80

37%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

28

13%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

100
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

94

45%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

132
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

13

6%

LEVEL 2

75

34%

LEVEL 3

87

40%

LEVEL 4

45

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

33

20%

LEVEL 2

76

46%

LEVEL 3

44

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

76

39%

LEVEL 3

72

37%

LEVEL 4

26

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

165

45%

LEVEL 3

123

34%

LEVEL 4

35

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

225
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

156

39%

LEVEL 4

69

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

9

31%

LEVEL 2

13

45%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

8

23%

LEVEL 2

14

40%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

162
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

40

11%

LEVEL 2

168

45%

LEVEL 3

125

34%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

233
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

148

36%

LEVEL 3

161

39%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

12

48%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

10

43%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

31

50%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

26

38%

LEVEL 3

24

35%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

141
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

147

44%

LEVEL 3

108

32%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

27

7%

LEVEL 2

132

36%

LEVEL 3

142

39%

LEVEL 4

64

18%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.