500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

EAST IRONDEQUOIT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

234

46%

LEVEL 2

211

41%

LEVEL 3

48

9%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

113

37%

LEVEL 2

121

39%

LEVEL 3

48

16%

LEVEL 4

27

9%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

31
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

94

44%

LEVEL 2

90

42%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

37
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

36

28%

LEVEL 2

56

43%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

140

47%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

26

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

77

43%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

24

13%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

19

59%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

9

39%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

6

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

51
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

107

38%

LEVEL 2

120

43%

LEVEL 3

37

13%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

46

28%

LEVEL 2

63

39%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

21

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

63

63%

LEVEL 2

35

35%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

32

60%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

40

44%

LEVEL 2

42

47%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

25

40%

LEVEL 2

28

45%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

66
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

174

39%

LEVEL 2

205

46%

LEVEL 3

48

11%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

75

28%

LEVEL 2

115

43%

LEVEL 3

48

18%

LEVEL 4

27

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

60

91%

LEVEL 2

6

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

38

86%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

66
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 505

LEVEL 1

230

46%

LEVEL 2

209

41%

LEVEL 3

48

10%

LEVEL 4

18

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

70

33%

LEVEL 2

102

47%

LEVEL 3

33

15%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

33

23%

LEVEL 2

63

43%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

164

55%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

15

5%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

80

49%

LEVEL 2

58

35%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.