500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

WILLIAM FLOYD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 958

LEVEL 1

378

39%

LEVEL 2

405

42%

LEVEL 3

149

16%

LEVEL 4

26

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

213

39%

LEVEL 2

218

40%

LEVEL 3

95

17%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

172

34%

LEVEL 2

226

45%

LEVEL 3

88

18%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

206

45%

LEVEL 2

179

39%

LEVEL 3

61

13%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

117

42%

LEVEL 2

113

41%

LEVEL 3

43

16%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

5

71%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

11

27%

LEVEL 2

16

39%

LEVEL 3

10

24%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

6

21%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

116
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

176

34%

LEVEL 2

225

44%

LEVEL 3

101

20%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

83

33%

LEVEL 2

104

41%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

77

62%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

44

60%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

107

41%

LEVEL 2

122

47%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

76

41%

LEVEL 2

72

39%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 852

LEVEL 1

290

34%

LEVEL 2

388

46%

LEVEL 3

149

17%

LEVEL 4

25

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

163

34%

LEVEL 2

206

42%

LEVEL 3

95

20%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

88

83%

LEVEL 2

17

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

50

81%

LEVEL 2

12

19%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

192

37%

LEVEL 2

217

41%

LEVEL 3

94

18%

LEVEL 4

21

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

1

4%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

124

28%

LEVEL 2

210

47%

LEVEL 3

97

22%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

70

27%

LEVEL 2

117

45%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 511

LEVEL 1

254

50%

LEVEL 2

195

38%

LEVEL 3

52

10%

LEVEL 4

10

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

143

50%

LEVEL 2

101

35%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.