500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 268 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

62

16%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

115

30%

LEVEL 4

66

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

60

15%

LEVEL 2

150

38%

LEVEL 3

111

28%

LEVEL 4

75

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

102
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

23

12%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

61

33%

LEVEL 4

41

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

104
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

28

14%

LEVEL 2

63

32%

LEVEL 3

58

30%

LEVEL 4

46

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

39

20%

LEVEL 2

79

40%

LEVEL 3

54

27%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

82
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

32

16%

LEVEL 2

87

43%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

18
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

16

38%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

21
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

9

19%

LEVEL 2

17

36%

LEVEL 3

15

32%

LEVEL 4

6

13%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

61
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

38

36%

LEVEL 4

23

22%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

73
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

7

7%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

37

35%

LEVEL 4

36

34%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

50
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

44

37%

LEVEL 3

33

28%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

43
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

59

47%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

50
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

37

35%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

43

42%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

19

18%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

33

10%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

110

34%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

173
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

41

12%

LEVEL 2

124

37%

LEVEL 3

99

29%

LEVEL 4

74

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

29

52%

LEVEL 2

20

36%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

19

33%

LEVEL 2

26

45%

LEVEL 3

12

21%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

179
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 363

LEVEL 1

51

14%

LEVEL 2

133

37%

LEVEL 3

113

31%

LEVEL 4

66

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

181
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

52

14%

LEVEL 2

137

37%

LEVEL 3

106

29%

LEVEL 4

75

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

11

55%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

13

50%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

17

19%

LEVEL 2

27

30%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

19

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 125

LEVEL 1

15

12%

LEVEL 2

55

44%

LEVEL 3

31

25%

LEVEL 4

24

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

113

38%

LEVEL 3

89

30%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

131
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

45

17%

LEVEL 2

95

35%

LEVEL 3

80

30%

LEVEL 4

51

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

175
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

177
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

59

15%

LEVEL 2

146

38%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

72

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

6

43%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.