500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 208 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

201
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

109

21%

LEVEL 2

203

40%

LEVEL 3

147

29%

LEVEL 4

54

11%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

86

17%

LEVEL 2

182

36%

LEVEL 3

151

30%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

125
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

44

16%

LEVEL 2

98

37%

LEVEL 3

92

34%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

135
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

87

33%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

65

26%

LEVEL 2

105

43%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

104
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

47

19%

LEVEL 2

95

39%

LEVEL 3

66

27%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

4

8%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

19

40%

LEVEL 4

13

27%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

154
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

93

23%

LEVEL 2

159

39%

LEVEL 3

113

28%

LEVEL 4

41

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

177
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

115

29%

LEVEL 4

62

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

7

17%

LEVEL 2

18

43%

LEVEL 3

13

31%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

7

14%

LEVEL 2

19

37%

LEVEL 3

13

25%

LEVEL 4

12

24%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

196
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

179

40%

LEVEL 3

143

32%

LEVEL 4

53

12%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

230
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

50

11%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

146

33%

LEVEL 4

84

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

40

58%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

36

52%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

79

38%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

106
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

41

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

66

22%

LEVEL 2

124

41%

LEVEL 3

81

27%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

133
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

50

17%

LEVEL 2

109

37%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.