500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 208 GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

160
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

116

23%

LEVEL 2

237

46%

LEVEL 3

119

23%

LEVEL 4

41

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

203
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

93

18%

LEVEL 2

212

42%

LEVEL 3

140

28%

LEVEL 4

63

12%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

117
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

111

42%

LEVEL 3

85

32%

LEVEL 4

32

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

126
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

109

42%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

46

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

126

51%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

103

42%

LEVEL 3

60

24%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

6

12%

LEVEL 2

21

41%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

5

10%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

30
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

3

6%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

20

42%

LEVEL 4

10

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

119
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

103

25%

LEVEL 2

184

45%

LEVEL 3

87

21%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

151
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

76

19%

LEVEL 2

169

43%

LEVEL 3

106

27%

LEVEL 4

45

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

6

14%

LEVEL 2

22

52%

LEVEL 3

12

29%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

9

18%

LEVEL 2

23

45%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

7

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 444

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

215

48%

LEVEL 3

118

27%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

195
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

47

11%

LEVEL 2

196

45%

LEVEL 3

133

30%

LEVEL 4

62

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

45

65%

LEVEL 2

22

32%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

46

66%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

100

48%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

88
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

36

17%

LEVEL 2

91

42%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

137

45%

LEVEL 3

72

24%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

115
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

57

19%

LEVEL 2

121

41%

LEVEL 3

81

28%

LEVEL 4

34

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.