500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS/IS 266 GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

187
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

44

12%

LEVEL 2

125

35%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

90

25%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

47

15%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

100

32%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

26

15%

LEVEL 2

58

33%

LEVEL 3

44

25%

LEVEL 4

46

26%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

84
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

24

15%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

47

30%

LEVEL 4

37

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

97
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

67

37%

LEVEL 3

53

29%

LEVEL 4

44

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

92
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

23

15%

LEVEL 2

41

26%

LEVEL 3

53

34%

LEVEL 4

39

25%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

98
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

49

30%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

47

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

84
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

11

8%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

42

31%

LEVEL 4

42

31%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

34
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

3

5%

LEVEL 2

20

35%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

21

37%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

8

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

8

14%

LEVEL 2

27

47%

LEVEL 3

14

24%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

26
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

12

21%

LEVEL 2

20

34%

LEVEL 3

17

29%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

16

23%

LEVEL 2

27

39%

LEVEL 3

16

23%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

36
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

19

26%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

21

28%

LEVEL 4

15

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

26

9%

LEVEL 2

98

33%

LEVEL 3

86

29%

LEVEL 4

86

29%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

167
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

72

26%

LEVEL 3

94

34%

LEVEL 4

73

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

18

30%

LEVEL 2

27

45%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

11

30%

LEVEL 2

17

46%

LEVEL 3

6

16%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

187
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

37

11%

LEVEL 2

122

35%

LEVEL 3

97

28%

LEVEL 4

90

26%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

176
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

4

67%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

50

30%

LEVEL 3

46

28%

LEVEL 4

55

33%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

20

12%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

57

34%

LEVEL 4

48

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

28

15%

LEVEL 2

75

40%

LEVEL 3

51

27%

LEVEL 4

35

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

47

32%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

28

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

186
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

44

13%

LEVEL 2

118

34%

LEVEL 3

96

28%

LEVEL 4

90

26%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

174
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

86

28%

LEVEL 3

100

33%

LEVEL 4

74

24%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

88%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.