500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

THE EXPLORATORY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

17

4%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

172

38%

LEVEL 4

130

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

112

27%

LEVEL 3

125

30%

LEVEL 4

155

38%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

77

35%

LEVEL 3

80

37%

LEVEL 4

50

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

10

5%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

66

32%

LEVEL 4

71

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

172
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

92

39%

LEVEL 4

80

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

84

41%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

20%

LEVEL 3

22

43%

LEVEL 4

19

37%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

11

31%

LEVEL 4

15

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

3

1%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

85

39%

LEVEL 4

83

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

159
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

101

51%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

44
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

50

50%

LEVEL 3

31

31%

LEVEL 4

13

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

9

10%

LEVEL 2

34

37%

LEVEL 3

32

35%

LEVEL 4

16

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

45
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

8

10%

LEVEL 2

25

32%

LEVEL 3

30

38%

LEVEL 4

15

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

44
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

7

9%

LEVEL 2

27

35%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

23

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

159

40%

LEVEL 4

121

30%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

262
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

5

1%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

144

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

12

22%

LEVEL 2

21

38%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

9

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

13

22%

LEVEL 2

29

48%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

11

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

245
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

131

40%

LEVEL 4

114

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

206
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

7

2%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

110

39%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

56

44%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

16

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

11

9%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

45

35%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.