500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

NYC LAB MS-COLLABORATIVE STUDIES GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

399
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

13

3%

LEVEL 2

33

7%

LEVEL 3

101

23%

LEVEL 4

298

67%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

380
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

6

1%

LEVEL 2

31

7%

LEVEL 3

85

20%

LEVEL 4

295

71%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

214
91%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

17

7%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

160

68%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

205
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 223

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

13

6%

LEVEL 3

42

19%

LEVEL 4

163

73%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

47

22%

LEVEL 4

138

66%

MALE

PROFICIENT

175
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

132

68%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

34
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

3

8%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

9

23%

LEVEL 4

25

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

31
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

8

24%

LEVEL 4

23

70%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

170
96%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

7

4%

LEVEL 3

27

15%

LEVEL 4

143

81%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

182
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

3%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

157

84%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

158
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

16

9%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

116

65%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

14

9%

LEVEL 3

39

25%

LEVEL 4

103

66%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

4

33%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

3

43%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

27
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

5

13%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

17

45%

LEVEL 4

10

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

2

6%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

10

30%

LEVEL 4

9

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

358
95%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

18

5%

LEVEL 3

80

21%

LEVEL 4

278

74%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
97%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

9

3%

LEVEL 3

66

19%

LEVEL 4

275

78%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

41
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

15

22%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

20

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

39
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

5

8%

LEVEL 2

22

33%

LEVEL 3

19

29%

LEVEL 4

20

30%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

253
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

9

3%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

66

23%

LEVEL 4

187

65%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

250
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

25

9%

LEVEL 3

62

22%

LEVEL 4

188

67%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

4

3%

LEVEL 2

8

5%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

111

70%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

6

4%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

107

78%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.