500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

UNCOMMON EXCELLENCE BOYS CS NYC GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

252
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

45

11%

LEVEL 2

100

25%

LEVEL 3

131

33%

LEVEL 4

121

30%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

97

23%

LEVEL 3

140

34%

LEVEL 4

140

34%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MALE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

7

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

228
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

43

12%

LEVEL 2

93

26%

LEVEL 3

120

33%

LEVEL 4

108

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

237
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

33

9%

LEVEL 2

86

24%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

112

31%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

7

37%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

17

49%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

81

25%

LEVEL 3

118

36%

LEVEL 4

108

33%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

247
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

23

7%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

118

34%

LEVEL 4

129

38%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

26
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

22

33%

LEVEL 2

19

28%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

13

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

33
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

23

33%

LEVEL 3

22

31%

LEVEL 4

11

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

270
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

37

9%

LEVEL 2

94

23%

LEVEL 3

136

34%

LEVEL 4

134

33%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 122

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

50

41%

LEVEL 4

36

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

12

11%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

32

30%

LEVEL 4

37

35%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

166
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

32

12%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

85

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

211
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

108

35%

LEVEL 4

103

33%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.