500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

BROOKLYN EXCELSIOR CS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

189

38%

LEVEL 2

207

42%

LEVEL 3

75

15%

LEVEL 4

20

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

189

42%

LEVEL 2

148

33%

LEVEL 3

83

18%

LEVEL 4

34

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

96

38%

LEVEL 2

106

42%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

103

43%

LEVEL 2

71

30%

LEVEL 3

46

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

93

39%

LEVEL 2

101

42%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

86

40%

LEVEL 2

77

36%

LEVEL 3

37

17%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

80
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

172

39%

LEVEL 2

189

43%

LEVEL 3

64

15%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

99
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

166

41%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

15

44%

LEVEL 2

7

21%

LEVEL 3

7

21%

LEVEL 4

5

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

194

44%

LEVEL 3

75

17%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 388

LEVEL 1

144

37%

LEVEL 2

132

34%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

34

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

13

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

45

68%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

77

34%

LEVEL 2

101

45%

LEVEL 3

36

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

10

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

112

42%

LEVEL 2

106

40%

LEVEL 3

39

15%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

172

43%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

74

18%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.