500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

DANA L LYON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

150
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 539

LEVEL 1

188

35%

LEVEL 2

201

37%

LEVEL 3

115

21%

LEVEL 4

35

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 521

LEVEL 1

174

33%

LEVEL 2

222

43%

LEVEL 3

95

18%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

86

33%

LEVEL 2

90

34%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

63

25%

LEVEL 2

117

47%

LEVEL 3

54

22%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

102

37%

LEVEL 2

111

40%

LEVEL 3

52

19%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

55
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

111

41%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

144
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

183

35%

LEVEL 2

196

37%

LEVEL 3

109

21%

LEVEL 4

35

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

169

34%

LEVEL 2

210

42%

LEVEL 3

93

19%

LEVEL 4

30

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

80%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

110

25%

LEVEL 2

183

42%

LEVEL 3

112

25%

LEVEL 4

35

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

105

24%

LEVEL 2

208

48%

LEVEL 3

93

21%

LEVEL 4

30

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

78

79%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

69

81%

LEVEL 2

14

16%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

105
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

66

23%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

75

26%

LEVEL 4

30

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

46

20%

LEVEL 2

100

44%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

122

49%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

40

16%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

128

44%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.