500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 304 EARLY CHILDHOOD SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

34

15%

LEVEL 2

86

38%

LEVEL 3

70

31%

LEVEL 4

34

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

37

15%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

78

32%

LEVEL 4

67

28%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

40

36%

LEVEL 3

38

35%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

14

12%

LEVEL 2

26

23%

LEVEL 3

38

34%

LEVEL 4

35

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

20

18%

LEVEL 2

46

40%

LEVEL 3

32

28%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

33

26%

LEVEL 3

40

31%

LEVEL 4

32

25%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

5

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

39

40%

LEVEL 3

32

33%

LEVEL 4

14

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

67
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

13

13%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

37

38%

LEVEL 4

30

31%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

43

45%

LEVEL 3

27

28%

LEVEL 4

10

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

57
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

21

19%

LEVEL 2

31

28%

LEVEL 3

32

29%

LEVEL 4

25

23%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

18

9%

LEVEL 2

74

39%

LEVEL 3

66

35%

LEVEL 4

33

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

44

23%

LEVEL 3

70

37%

LEVEL 4

63

34%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

26

49%

LEVEL 2

15

28%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

10

14%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

23

32%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

7

10%

LEVEL 2

11

16%

LEVEL 3

23

33%

LEVEL 4

29

41%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

65
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

63

41%

LEVEL 3

47

31%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

55

32%

LEVEL 4

38

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.