500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SCHOOL OF PERFORMING ARTS GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

231

72%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

178

62%

LEVEL 2

86

30%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

7
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

125

69%

LEVEL 2

48

27%

LEVEL 3

5

3%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

97

59%

LEVEL 2

53

32%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

106

75%

LEVEL 2

29

20%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

81

67%

LEVEL 2

33

27%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

65

72%

LEVEL 2

24

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

50

60%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

162

73%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

9

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

121

64%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

12

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

14
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

153

63%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

121

56%

LEVEL 2

74

34%

LEVEL 3

19

9%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

78

96%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

57

83%

LEVEL 2

12

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

14
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

168

66%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

12

5%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

19
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

133

59%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

17

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

63

95%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

45

76%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

36

71%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

20

61%

LEVEL 2

10

30%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

195

72%

LEVEL 2

63

23%

LEVEL 3

12

4%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

158

63%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

16

6%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.