500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ST LAWRENCE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

104
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

81

30%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

110
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

98

33%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

66
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

40

30%

LEVEL 3

41

31%

LEVEL 4

25

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

40

28%

LEVEL 2

40

28%

LEVEL 3

40

28%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

38
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

57

42%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

27

20%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

58

38%

LEVEL 2

48

31%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

18

12%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

78

31%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

62

25%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

104
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

93

33%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

68

24%

LEVEL 4

36

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

59

25%

LEVEL 2

72

31%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

36

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

63

26%

LEVEL 2

76

31%

LEVEL 3

69

28%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

26

72%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

35

71%

LEVEL 2

12

24%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

25

20%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

45

35%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

38

30%

LEVEL 4

32

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

60

42%

LEVEL 2

46

32%

LEVEL 3

23

16%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

76

45%

LEVEL 2

54

32%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

98
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

33

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

108
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

94

33%

LEVEL 2

85

30%

LEVEL 3

70

24%

LEVEL 4

38

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

8

44%

LEVEL 2

4

22%

LEVEL 3

3

17%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

3

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.