500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

COHOES MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

134

34%

LEVEL 2

159

40%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

85

31%

LEVEL 2

112

41%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

78

38%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

40

19%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

42

32%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

32

24%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

56

30%

LEVEL 2

84

45%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

33
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

43

30%

LEVEL 2

65

46%

LEVEL 3

26

18%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

95
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

94

29%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

74

23%

LEVEL 4

21

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

70
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

59

27%

LEVEL 2

87

40%

LEVEL 3

53

25%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

22

59%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

10

53%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

9

45%

LEVEL 2

9

45%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

91

27%

LEVEL 2

146

43%

LEVEL 3

79

23%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

52

23%

LEVEL 2

102

44%

LEVEL 3

58

25%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

43

74%

LEVEL 2

13

22%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

33

77%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

75
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

83

31%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

57

21%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

29

22%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

35

27%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

21

23%

LEVEL 2

33

36%

LEVEL 3

26

29%

LEVEL 4

11

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

105

39%

LEVEL 2

105

39%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

64

35%

LEVEL 2

79

43%

LEVEL 3

32

18%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.