500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LISHA KILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

57

13%

LEVEL 2

116

27%

LEVEL 3

159

37%

LEVEL 4

99

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 469

LEVEL 1

83

18%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

145

31%

LEVEL 4

93

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

88

41%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

109
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

42

19%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

61

28%

LEVEL 4

48

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

33

15%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

71

33%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

129
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 248

LEVEL 1

41

17%

LEVEL 2

78

31%

LEVEL 3

84

34%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

3

11%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

5

19%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

9

35%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

39
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

2

4%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

19

37%

LEVEL 4

20

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

37
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

6

11%

LEVEL 2

11

20%

LEVEL 3

21

39%

LEVEL 4

16

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

189
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

45

14%

LEVEL 2

79

25%

LEVEL 3

120

38%

LEVEL 4

69

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

167
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

112

34%

LEVEL 3

104

32%

LEVEL 4

63

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

4

16%

LEVEL 2

10

40%

LEVEL 3

8

32%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

7

24%

LEVEL 2

10

34%

LEVEL 3

8

28%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

3

21%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

6

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

257
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

105

27%

LEVEL 3

159

40%

LEVEL 4

98

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

43

10%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

141

34%

LEVEL 4

92

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

26

68%

LEVEL 2

11

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

40

74%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

216
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

35

10%

LEVEL 2

85

25%

LEVEL 3

133

40%

LEVEL 4

83

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

193
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

48

13%

LEVEL 2

118

33%

LEVEL 3

112

31%

LEVEL 4

81

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

22

23%

LEVEL 2

31

33%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

16

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

35

32%

LEVEL 2

30

27%

LEVEL 3

33

30%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.