500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHENANGO FORKS CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

227
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

189

28%

LEVEL 2

263

39%

LEVEL 3

147

22%

LEVEL 4

80

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

193
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

143

28%

LEVEL 2

174

34%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

97

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

96
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

91

28%

LEVEL 2

135

42%

LEVEL 3

65

20%

LEVEL 4

31

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

87
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

76

31%

LEVEL 2

86

35%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

45

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 357

LEVEL 1

98

27%

LEVEL 2

128

36%

LEVEL 3

82

23%

LEVEL 4

49

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 261

LEVEL 1

67

26%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

54

21%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

216
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 632

LEVEL 1

170

27%

LEVEL 2

246

39%

LEVEL 3

142

22%

LEVEL 4

74

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

185
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

132

28%

LEVEL 2

156

33%

LEVEL 3

94

20%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

132

22%

LEVEL 2

244

41%

LEVEL 3

144

24%

LEVEL 4

79

13%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

99

22%

LEVEL 2

163

36%

LEVEL 3

94

21%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

57

71%

LEVEL 2

19

24%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

44

75%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

174
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

71

18%

LEVEL 2

146

37%

LEVEL 3

107

27%

LEVEL 4

67

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

62

20%

LEVEL 2

99

32%

LEVEL 3

72

23%

LEVEL 4

76

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

118

41%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

40

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

81

40%

LEVEL 2

75

37%

LEVEL 3

24

12%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.