500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SUSQUEHANNA VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

199

30%

LEVEL 2

295

44%

LEVEL 3

149

22%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

154

27%

LEVEL 2

249

43%

LEVEL 3

132

23%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

75

26%

LEVEL 2

140

48%

LEVEL 3

60

21%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

53

21%

LEVEL 2

118

47%

LEVEL 3

64

25%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

105
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

124

32%

LEVEL 2

155

40%

LEVEL 3

89

23%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

90
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

101

31%

LEVEL 2

131

41%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

4

33%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

9

56%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

4

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

163
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 612

LEVEL 1

175

29%

LEVEL 2

274

45%

LEVEL 3

133

22%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

161
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

140

27%

LEVEL 2

223

43%

LEVEL 3

123

23%

LEVEL 4

38

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

12

57%

LEVEL 2

8

38%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

177
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 587

LEVEL 1

139

24%

LEVEL 2

271

46%

LEVEL 3

148

25%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

170
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

106

21%

LEVEL 2

224

45%

LEVEL 3

130

26%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

60

70%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

48

64%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 418

LEVEL 1

94

22%

LEVEL 2

182

44%

LEVEL 3

114

27%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

76

21%

LEVEL 2

160

44%

LEVEL 3

91

25%

LEVEL 4

37

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

113

44%

LEVEL 3

35

14%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

78

37%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.