500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

HOMER BRINK SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

53

17%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

103

32%

LEVEL 4

76

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

185
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

42

14%

LEVEL 2

66

23%

LEVEL 3

115

39%

LEVEL 4

70

24%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

81
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

50

34%

LEVEL 4

31

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

30

21%

LEVEL 3

62

43%

LEVEL 4

23

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

98
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

53

31%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

53

35%

LEVEL 4

47

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

43

15%

LEVEL 2

76

26%

LEVEL 3

95

33%

LEVEL 4

75

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

175
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

36

13%

LEVEL 2

59

22%

LEVEL 3

106

39%

LEVEL 4

69

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

28

10%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

75

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

175
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

55

22%

LEVEL 3

106

43%

LEVEL 4

69

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

25

56%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

11

24%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

43

20%

LEVEL 3

74

35%

LEVEL 4

68

32%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

144
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

37

19%

LEVEL 3

78

41%

LEVEL 4

66

34%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

27

25%

LEVEL 2

43

40%

LEVEL 3

29

27%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

31

31%

LEVEL 2

29

29%

LEVEL 3

37

37%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.