500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

209

44%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

73

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 483

LEVEL 1

199

41%

LEVEL 2

176

36%

LEVEL 3

85

18%

LEVEL 4

23

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

77

33%

LEVEL 2

91

39%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

133

52%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

122

49%

LEVEL 2

85

34%

LEVEL 3

31

13%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

21

47%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

20

44%

LEVEL 2

15

33%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

68

61%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

12
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

62

56%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

105

35%

LEVEL 2

114

38%

LEVEL 3

63

21%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

143

36%

LEVEL 2

164

41%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

108
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

133

33%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

85

21%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

66

89%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

66

80%

LEVEL 2

16

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

42

28%

LEVEL 2

63

42%

LEVEL 3

32

21%

LEVEL 4

12

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

158

52%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 334

LEVEL 1

157

47%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.