500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

GOWANDA CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

78
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

191

46%

LEVEL 2

144

35%

LEVEL 3

63

15%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 470

LEVEL 1

209

44%

LEVEL 2

171

36%

LEVEL 3

73

16%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

50
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

77

39%

LEVEL 2

69

35%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

76

35%

LEVEL 2

85

39%

LEVEL 3

44

20%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

114

53%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

133

52%

LEVEL 2

86

34%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

14

41%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

21

47%

LEVEL 2

16

36%

LEVEL 3

8

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

9
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

60

59%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

68

61%

LEVEL 2

36

32%

LEVEL 3

5

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

105

41%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

72
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

107

37%

LEVEL 2

111

38%

LEVEL 3

57

20%

LEVEL 4

15

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

76
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

129

38%

LEVEL 2

134

40%

LEVEL 3

61

18%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

143

36%

LEVEL 2

164

41%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

62

84%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

66

89%

LEVEL 2

7

9%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

50

33%

LEVEL 2

62

41%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

6

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

51

31%

LEVEL 2

71

43%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

141

54%

LEVEL 2

82

32%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

158

52%

LEVEL 2

100

33%

LEVEL 3

36

12%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.