500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PIONEER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

62

13%

LEVEL 2

174

36%

LEVEL 3

158

33%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

83

16%

LEVEL 2

164

32%

LEVEL 3

177

35%

LEVEL 4

84

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

83

36%

LEVEL 3

81

35%

LEVEL 4

47

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

143
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

73

30%

LEVEL 3

98

41%

LEVEL 4

45

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

121
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

44

17%

LEVEL 2

91

36%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

118
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

59

22%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

79

29%

LEVEL 4

39

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 460

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

160

35%

LEVEL 3

153

33%

LEVEL 4

88

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

251
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

77

16%

LEVEL 2

154

32%

LEVEL 3

171

35%

LEVEL 4

80

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

144

36%

LEVEL 3

144

36%

LEVEL 4

89

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 414

LEVEL 1

33

8%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

163

39%

LEVEL 4

81

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

40

47%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

50

53%

LEVEL 2

27

29%

LEVEL 3

14

15%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

139
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

84

37%

LEVEL 4

55

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

25

11%

LEVEL 2

77

33%

LEVEL 3

88

37%

LEVEL 4

46

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

45

18%

LEVEL 2

101

39%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

36

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

127
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

58

21%

LEVEL 2

87

32%

LEVEL 3

89

33%

LEVEL 4

38

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.