500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ERNIE DAVIS MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

154

35%

LEVEL 2

187

43%

LEVEL 3

89

20%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

164

43%

LEVEL 2

157

41%

LEVEL 3

52

14%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

74

34%

LEVEL 2

95

43%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

78

45%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

80

37%

LEVEL 2

92

42%

LEVEL 3

40

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

90

44%

LEVEL 2

79

39%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

8

53%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

90

30%

LEVEL 2

122

41%

LEVEL 3

77

26%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

90

36%

LEVEL 2

109

44%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

51

45%

LEVEL 2

52

46%

LEVEL 3

10

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

63

59%

LEVEL 2

38

36%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

95
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

176

46%

LEVEL 3

88

23%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

142

44%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

39

71%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

27

16%

LEVEL 2

69

42%

LEVEL 3

63

38%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

24

20%

LEVEL 2

58

48%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

127

47%

LEVEL 2

118

44%

LEVEL 3

26

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

140

54%

LEVEL 2

99

38%

LEVEL 3

18

7%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.