500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

THOMAS K BEECHER SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

174

49%

LEVEL 2

134

37%

LEVEL 3

34

9%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

206

56%

LEVEL 2

114

31%

LEVEL 3

38

10%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 175

LEVEL 1

77

44%

LEVEL 2

70

40%

LEVEL 3

19

11%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

102

55%

LEVEL 2

61

33%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

97

53%

LEVEL 2

64

35%

LEVEL 3

15

8%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

104

58%

LEVEL 2

53

30%

LEVEL 3

21

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

27

47%

LEVEL 2

28

49%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 69

LEVEL 1

43

62%

LEVEL 2

18

26%

LEVEL 3

7

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

39
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

99

47%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

28
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

112

53%

LEVEL 2

73

34%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

42

52%

LEVEL 2

33

41%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

42

62%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

49
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 312

LEVEL 1

136

44%

LEVEL 2

127

41%

LEVEL 3

33

11%

LEVEL 4

16

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

45
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

160

51%

LEVEL 2

110

35%

LEVEL 3

38

12%

LEVEL 4

7

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

38

83%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

46

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

21

32%

LEVEL 2

32

49%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

24

38%

LEVEL 2

25

40%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

153

52%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

27

9%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

182

60%

LEVEL 2

89

29%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.