500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PARLEY COBURN SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 507

LEVEL 1

273

54%

LEVEL 2

162

32%

LEVEL 3

60

12%

LEVEL 4

12

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

211

52%

LEVEL 2

128

31%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

32
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

119

52%

LEVEL 2

80

35%

LEVEL 3

26

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

23
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

92

51%

LEVEL 2

65

36%

LEVEL 3

17

9%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

154

56%

LEVEL 2

82

30%

LEVEL 3

34

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

119

52%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

38

17%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

15

65%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

194

51%

LEVEL 2

126

33%

LEVEL 3

55

14%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

58
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

143

48%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

52

65%

LEVEL 2

23

29%

LEVEL 3

4

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

34

65%

LEVEL 2

13

25%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

72
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

207

47%

LEVEL 2

158

36%

LEVEL 3

60

14%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

166

47%

LEVEL 2

123

35%

LEVEL 3

54

15%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

66

94%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

45

88%

LEVEL 2

5

10%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

56

40%

LEVEL 2

53

38%

LEVEL 3

23

17%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

32

33%

LEVEL 2

36

37%

LEVEL 3

26

27%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

217

59%

LEVEL 2

109

30%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

38
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

179

58%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

29

9%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.