500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

HORSEHEADS INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 638

LEVEL 1

149

23%

LEVEL 2

210

33%

LEVEL 3

168

26%

LEVEL 4

111

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

99

19%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

157

30%

LEVEL 4

104

20%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

130
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

65

21%

LEVEL 2

116

37%

LEVEL 3

76

24%

LEVEL 4

54

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

43

17%

LEVEL 2

88

35%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

84

26%

LEVEL 2

94

29%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

56

20%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

53

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

3

16%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

26%

LEVEL 4

11

58%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

13

62%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

133

23%

LEVEL 2

196

34%

LEVEL 3

155

27%

LEVEL 4

89

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 458

LEVEL 1

91

20%

LEVEL 2

141

31%

LEVEL 3

144

31%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

4

27%

LEVEL 2

6

40%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

274
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

83

15%

LEVEL 2

192

35%

LEVEL 3

164

30%

LEVEL 4

110

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

258
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 465

LEVEL 1

59

13%

LEVEL 2

148

32%

LEVEL 3

155

33%

LEVEL 4

103

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

66

74%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

40

68%

LEVEL 2

16

27%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

236
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

130

30%

LEVEL 4

106

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

209
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

95

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

90

45%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

61

33%

LEVEL 2

73

39%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.