500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

LINDEN AVENUE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

65

16%

LEVEL 2

152

37%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

104

34%

LEVEL 3

83

27%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

114
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

69

34%

LEVEL 3

71

35%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

71
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 142

LEVEL 1

26

18%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

45

32%

LEVEL 4

26

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

46

22%

LEVEL 2

83

40%

LEVEL 3

47

23%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

61
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

42

26%

LEVEL 2

59

36%

LEVEL 3

38

23%

LEVEL 4

23

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

5
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

3

30%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

170
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

52

15%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

109

31%

LEVEL 4

61

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

115
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

55

21%

LEVEL 2

88

34%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

44

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

9

28%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

6

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

10

36%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

6

21%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

32

9%

LEVEL 2

144

39%

LEVEL 3

117

32%

LEVEL 4

72

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

94

36%

LEVEL 3

82

32%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

33

79%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

35

76%

LEVEL 2

10

22%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

190
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

61

15%

LEVEL 2

150

37%

LEVEL 3

118

29%

LEVEL 4

72

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

132
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

65

22%

LEVEL 2

101

34%

LEVEL 3

83

28%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

168
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 327

LEVEL 1

39

12%

LEVEL 2

120

37%

LEVEL 3

102

31%

LEVEL 4

66

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

121
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

36

15%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

77

32%

LEVEL 4

44

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

26

33%

LEVEL 2

32

40%

LEVEL 3

16

20%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

11
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

32

48%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.