500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MYERS CORNERS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

139

31%

LEVEL 2

188

42%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

102

36%

LEVEL 2

116

40%

LEVEL 3

49

17%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

63

29%

LEVEL 2

89

42%

LEVEL 3

48

22%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

27

19%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

99

43%

LEVEL 3

44

19%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

57

39%

LEVEL 2

61

41%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

5

14%

LEVEL 2

15

43%

LEVEL 3

13

37%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

8

31%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

9

35%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

82
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

86

28%

LEVEL 2

135

45%

LEVEL 3

69

23%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

46
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

46

27%

LEVEL 2

76

45%

LEVEL 3

32

19%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

31

42%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

35

52%

LEVEL 2

26

39%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

65

19%

LEVEL 2

170

49%

LEVEL 3

89

26%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

67
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

51

23%

LEVEL 2

107

48%

LEVEL 3

47

21%

LEVEL 4

20

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

74

78%

LEVEL 2

18

19%

LEVEL 3

3

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

51

82%

LEVEL 2

9

15%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

116
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

135

31%

LEVEL 2

186

43%

LEVEL 3

92

21%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

103
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

77

25%

LEVEL 2

131

42%

LEVEL 3

81

26%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

84

45%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

13
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

62

47%

LEVEL 2

57

43%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

58

58%

LEVEL 2

32

32%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.