500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MILL MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

401
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 802

LEVEL 1

114

14%

LEVEL 2

287

36%

LEVEL 3

257

32%

LEVEL 4

144

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

85

17%

LEVEL 2

169

33%

LEVEL 3

163

32%

LEVEL 4

96

19%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

225
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

41

10%

LEVEL 2

145

35%

LEVEL 3

132

32%

LEVEL 4

93

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

153
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

96

36%

LEVEL 4

57

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 391

LEVEL 1

73

19%

LEVEL 2

142

36%

LEVEL 3

125

32%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

106
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

85

35%

LEVEL 3

67

27%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

7

15%

LEVEL 2

15

31%

LEVEL 3

14

29%

LEVEL 4

12

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

27
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

6

13%

LEVEL 2

13

28%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

15

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

336
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

87

14%

LEVEL 2

220

34%

LEVEL 3

215

33%

LEVEL 4

121

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

64

16%

LEVEL 2

129

32%

LEVEL 3

138

34%

LEVEL 4

73

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

12

32%

LEVEL 2

19

50%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

11

44%

LEVEL 2

13

52%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

18

49%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

9

41%

LEVEL 4

3

14%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

395
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

68

9%

LEVEL 2

265

36%

LEVEL 3

252

35%

LEVEL 4

143

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

154

33%

LEVEL 3

158

34%

LEVEL 4

95

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

46

62%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

30

59%

LEVEL 2

15

29%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

360
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 673

LEVEL 1

80

12%

LEVEL 2

233

35%

LEVEL 3

227

34%

LEVEL 4

133

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

237
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 432

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

139

32%

LEVEL 3

144

33%

LEVEL 4

93

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

34

26%

LEVEL 2

54

42%

LEVEL 3

30

23%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

29

36%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

19

23%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.