500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PS 27 HILLERY PARK ACADEMY GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

207

59%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

26

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

35
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

167

61%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

29

11%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

16
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

100

55%

LEVEL 2

66

36%

LEVEL 3

14

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

14
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

82

60%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

12
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

107

63%

LEVEL 2

51

30%

LEVEL 3

12

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

21
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

85

61%

LEVEL 2

33

24%

LEVEL 3

18

13%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

5

45%

LEVEL 2

5

45%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

89

50%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

60

52%

LEVEL 2

34

30%

LEVEL 3

18

16%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

84

73%

LEVEL 2

29

25%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

81

75%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

19

66%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

18

62%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

7

24%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

23
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

154

55%

LEVEL 2

104

37%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

29
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

119

56%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

24

11%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

53

75%

LEVEL 2

13

18%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

48

79%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

34

48%

LEVEL 2

28

39%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

28

52%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

7

13%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

173

62%

LEVEL 2

89

32%

LEVEL 3

18

6%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

27
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

139

63%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

22

10%

LEVEL 4

5

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.