500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CITY HONORS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

315
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

21

6%

LEVEL 2

39

10%

LEVEL 3

156

42%

LEVEL 4

159

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

337
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

33

8%

LEVEL 3

139

35%

LEVEL 4

198

50%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

20

11%

LEVEL 3

88

47%

LEVEL 4

78

41%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

177
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

17

9%

LEVEL 3

81

41%

LEVEL 4

96

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

18

10%

LEVEL 2

19

10%

LEVEL 3

68

37%

LEVEL 4

81

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

22

11%

LEVEL 2

16

8%

LEVEL 3

58

29%

LEVEL 4

102

52%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

14
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

9

56%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

28
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

16

53%

LEVEL 4

12

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

38
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

3

7%

LEVEL 3

18

43%

LEVEL 4

20

48%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

211
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

23

9%

LEVEL 3

102

42%

LEVEL 4

109

44%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

217
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

10

4%

LEVEL 2

20

8%

LEVEL 3

82

33%

LEVEL 4

135

55%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

9

14%

LEVEL 2

11

17%

LEVEL 3

26

40%

LEVEL 4

19

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

48
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

7

11%

LEVEL 3

28

42%

LEVEL 4

20

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
90%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

7

33%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

14

58%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

300
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

2

1%

LEVEL 2

36

11%

LEVEL 3

147

43%

LEVEL 4

153

45%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

326
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

29

8%

LEVEL 3

135

38%

LEVEL 4

191

54%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

19

51%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

9

24%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

24

62%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

7

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

238
87%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

23

8%

LEVEL 3

116

42%

LEVEL 4

122

45%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

251
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

12

4%

LEVEL 2

19

7%

LEVEL 3

96

34%

LEVEL 4

155

55%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

9

9%

LEVEL 2

16

16%

LEVEL 3

40

39%

LEVEL 4

37

36%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

86
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

13

12%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

43

38%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.