500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CITY HONORS SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

333
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

25

6%

LEVEL 2

76

18%

LEVEL 3

176

41%

LEVEL 4

157

36%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

288
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

68

18%

LEVEL 3

134

35%

LEVEL 4

154

40%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

190
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

29

13%

LEVEL 3

89

40%

LEVEL 4

101

46%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

162
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 194

LEVEL 1

4

2%

LEVEL 2

28

14%

LEVEL 3

67

35%

LEVEL 4

95

49%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

24

11%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

87

41%

LEVEL 4

56

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

126
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

21

11%

LEVEL 2

40

21%

LEVEL 3

67

36%

LEVEL 4

59

32%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

29
94%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

6%

LEVEL 3

17

55%

LEVEL 4

12

39%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

26
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

18

58%

LEVEL 4

8

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

47

16%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

119

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

194
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

43

17%

LEVEL 3

87

35%

LEVEL 4

107

43%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

45
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

11

15%

LEVEL 2

19

25%

LEVEL 3

27

36%

LEVEL 4

18

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

37
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

17

26%

LEVEL 3

20

30%

LEVEL 4

17

26%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

2

8%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

15

63%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

6

29%

LEVEL 4

12

57%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

327
83%
TOTAL TESTED: 393

LEVEL 1

1

0%

LEVEL 2

65

17%

LEVEL 3

174

44%

LEVEL 4

153

39%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 344

LEVEL 1

4

1%

LEVEL 2

60

17%

LEVEL 3

129

38%

LEVEL 4

151

44%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

24

59%

LEVEL 2

11

27%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

4

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

21

57%

LEVEL 2

8

22%

LEVEL 3

5

14%

LEVEL 4

3

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

262
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

8

2%

LEVEL 2

51

16%

LEVEL 3

130

40%

LEVEL 4

132

41%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

219
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 275

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

45

16%

LEVEL 3

95

35%

LEVEL 4

124

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

71
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

17

15%

LEVEL 2

25

22%

LEVEL 3

46

41%

LEVEL 4

25

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

14

13%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

39

37%

LEVEL 4

30

28%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.