500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

UNION EAST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 289

LEVEL 1

89

31%

LEVEL 2

104

36%

LEVEL 3

72

25%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

103
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

72

28%

LEVEL 2

85

33%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

51
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

44

31%

LEVEL 2

49

34%

LEVEL 3

38

26%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

35

27%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

34

26%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

45
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

45

31%

LEVEL 2

55

38%

LEVEL 3

34

23%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

37

29%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

31

24%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

7

35%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

8

44%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

34

23%

LEVEL 2

51

35%

LEVEL 3

46

31%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

20

19%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

34

32%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

45

46%

LEVEL 2

35

36%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 95

LEVEL 1

40

42%

LEVEL 2

34

36%

LEVEL 3

16

17%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

7

58%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

7

32%

LEVEL 2

9

41%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

56

23%

LEVEL 2

96

39%

LEVEL 3

70

28%

LEVEL 4

24

10%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

41

19%

LEVEL 2

75

35%

LEVEL 3

63

29%

LEVEL 4

38

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

33

77%

LEVEL 2

8

19%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

31

72%

LEVEL 2

10

23%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

96
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

85

30%

LEVEL 2

101

36%

LEVEL 3

72

26%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

103
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

67

27%

LEVEL 2

81

32%

LEVEL 3

65

26%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

4

44%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

13

16%

LEVEL 2

29

35%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

12

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

23

32%

LEVEL 3

19

26%

LEVEL 4

18

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

76

37%

LEVEL 2

75

36%

LEVEL 3

43

21%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

59

32%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

46

25%

LEVEL 4

20

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.