500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CHEEKTOWAGA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

276

52%

LEVEL 2

143

27%

LEVEL 3

87

16%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 520

LEVEL 1

276

53%

LEVEL 2

148

28%

LEVEL 3

80

15%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

125

49%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

122

51%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

151

54%

LEVEL 2

67

24%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

53
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

154

55%

LEVEL 2

75

27%

LEVEL 3

43

15%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

7

20%

LEVEL 2

13

37%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

7

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

62
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

90

41%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

17

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

53
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 201

LEVEL 1

80

40%

LEVEL 2

68

34%

LEVEL 3

41

20%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

21
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

142

70%

LEVEL 2

41

20%

LEVEL 3

20

10%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

143

70%

LEVEL 2

47

23%

LEVEL 3

14

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

27

55%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

30

58%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

113
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

196

44%

LEVEL 2

140

31%

LEVEL 3

85

19%

LEVEL 4

28

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 447

LEVEL 1

208

47%

LEVEL 2

145

32%

LEVEL 3

78

17%

LEVEL 4

16

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

80

93%

LEVEL 2

3

3%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

68

93%

LEVEL 2

3

4%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

114
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

260

50%

LEVEL 2

142

28%

LEVEL 3

85

16%

LEVEL 4

29

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

93
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

260

52%

LEVEL 2

145

29%

LEVEL 3

77

15%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

16

84%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

16

73%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

82

38%

LEVEL 2

67

31%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

69

40%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

37

22%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

52
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

194

60%

LEVEL 2

76

24%

LEVEL 3

42

13%

LEVEL 4

10

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

207

59%

LEVEL 2

92

26%

LEVEL 3

43

12%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

115
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

273

52%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

86

16%

LEVEL 4

29

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

96
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

269

53%

LEVEL 2

147

29%

LEVEL 3

80

16%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

7

88%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.