500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MARYVALE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

180
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

100

27%

LEVEL 2

88

24%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

69

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

161
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

115

30%

LEVEL 2

104

27%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

51

29%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

57

32%

LEVEL 4

32

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

60
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

53

32%

LEVEL 2

52

32%

LEVEL 3

31

19%

LEVEL 4

29

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

49

26%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

54

28%

LEVEL 4

37

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

101
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

62

29%

LEVEL 2

52

24%

LEVEL 3

62

29%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

8

42%

LEVEL 4

5

26%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

7

44%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

5

25%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

4

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

58

22%

LEVEL 2

66

25%

LEVEL 3

86

33%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

126
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

67

25%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

71

26%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

25

52%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

11

23%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

29

59%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

9

18%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

11

48%

LEVEL 2

6

26%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

9

38%

LEVEL 2

8

33%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

3

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

77

24%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

68

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

72

23%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

86

27%

LEVEL 4

66

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

37

71%

LEVEL 2

11

21%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

43

72%

LEVEL 2

8

13%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

175
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

81

24%

LEVEL 3

107

32%

LEVEL 4

68

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

153
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

93

27%

LEVEL 2

96

28%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

67

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

17

59%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

4

14%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

8

21%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

99
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

31

21%

LEVEL 3

62

41%

LEVEL 4

37

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

93
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

30

18%

LEVEL 2

42

25%

LEVEL 3

51

31%

LEVEL 4

42

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 218

LEVEL 1

80

37%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

32

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 215

LEVEL 1

85

40%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

160
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

112

30%

LEVEL 2

103

27%

LEVEL 3

93

25%

LEVEL 4

67

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.