500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MARYVALE INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

97

26%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

111

30%

LEVEL 4

47

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 377

LEVEL 1

86

23%

LEVEL 2

140

37%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

44

24%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

60

33%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

29

17%

LEVEL 2

64

39%

LEVEL 3

54

33%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

18

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

57

27%

LEVEL 2

76

36%

LEVEL 3

69

33%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

5

26%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

4

21%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

6

38%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

6

33%

LEVEL 4

3

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

114
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

81

31%

LEVEL 4

33

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

113
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

100

38%

LEVEL 3

93

35%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

17

36%

LEVEL 2

14

30%

LEVEL 3

13

28%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

19

38%

LEVEL 2

21

42%

LEVEL 3

8

16%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

7

33%

LEVEL 2

6

29%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

6

24%

LEVEL 2

9

36%

LEVEL 3

10

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

63

20%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

48

15%

LEVEL 2

122

38%

LEVEL 3

121

38%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

34

65%

LEVEL 2

14

27%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

38

64%

LEVEL 2

18

31%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

156
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

83

24%

LEVEL 2

103

30%

LEVEL 3

109

32%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

149
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

127

36%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

2

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

12

44%

LEVEL 2

13

48%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

55

37%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

22

13%

LEVEL 2

58

34%

LEVEL 3

74

43%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

73

33%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

56

26%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

82

40%

LEVEL 3

49

24%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

149
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

139

37%

LEVEL 3

121

33%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.