500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SHERIDAN HILL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 6, 2015 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2014

2015

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

179
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

13

5%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

104

39%

LEVEL 4

75

28%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

16

7%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

103

44%

LEVEL 4

61

26%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

79
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

2

2%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

56

48%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

73
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

6

5%

LEVEL 2

32

29%

LEVEL 3

51

46%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

100
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

11

7%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

48

32%

LEVEL 4

52

34%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

10

8%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

52

42%

LEVEL 4

39

31%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

13

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

2

10%

LEVEL 3

7

35%

LEVEL 4

10

50%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

151
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

11

5%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

93

39%

LEVEL 4

58

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

141
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

15

7%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

93

46%

LEVEL 4

48

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

5

2%

LEVEL 2

59

25%

LEVEL 3

101

42%

LEVEL 4

73

31%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

8

4%

LEVEL 2

47

22%

LEVEL 3

98

46%

LEVEL 4

60

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

17

57%

LEVEL 3

3

10%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

8

36%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

177
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

74

28%

LEVEL 3

103

39%

LEVEL 4

74

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

170
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 247

LEVEL 1

8

3%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

96

39%

LEVEL 4

74

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

159
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

14

6%

LEVEL 2

48

22%

LEVEL 3

98

44%

LEVEL 4

61

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

5

24%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

8

38%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

2

14%

LEVEL 2

7

50%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.