500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FRONTIER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

244
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 451

LEVEL 1

70

16%

LEVEL 2

137

30%

LEVEL 3

146

32%

LEVEL 4

98

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

255
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

106

24%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

97
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 193

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

66

34%

LEVEL 3

53

27%

LEVEL 4

44

23%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

22

12%

LEVEL 2

52

28%

LEVEL 3

64

35%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

147
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

40

16%

LEVEL 2

71

28%

LEVEL 3

93

36%

LEVEL 4

54

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

144
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 256

LEVEL 1

33

13%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

85

33%

LEVEL 4

59

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

8

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

50

13%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

126

32%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

235
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

38

10%

LEVEL 2

107

28%

LEVEL 3

139

37%

LEVEL 4

96

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

6

55%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

5

21%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

6

25%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

10

38%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

233
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 381

LEVEL 1

31

8%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

138

36%

LEVEL 4

95

25%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

23

6%

LEVEL 2

108

29%

LEVEL 3

143

38%

LEVEL 4

102

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

39

56%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

32

49%

LEVEL 2

23

35%

LEVEL 3

6

9%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

253
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

53

12%

LEVEL 2

129

30%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

106

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

200
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

118

37%

LEVEL 4

82

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

210
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

27

8%

LEVEL 2

86

27%

LEVEL 3

117

36%

LEVEL 4

93

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

41

31%

LEVEL 2

47

36%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

45
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 118

LEVEL 1

28

24%

LEVEL 2

45

38%

LEVEL 3

32

27%

LEVEL 4

13

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.