500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

FRONTIER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

309
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

66

14%

LEVEL 2

103

22%

LEVEL 3

160

33%

LEVEL 4

149

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

97

20%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

121

24%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

160
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

18

8%

LEVEL 2

34

16%

LEVEL 3

78

37%

LEVEL 4

82

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

26

12%

LEVEL 2

50

23%

LEVEL 3

75

35%

LEVEL 4

62

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

82

31%

LEVEL 4

67

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

143
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

71

25%

LEVEL 2

69

24%

LEVEL 3

84

30%

LEVEL 4

59

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

5

23%

LEVEL 2

8

36%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

5

23%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

5

31%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

277
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

49

12%

LEVEL 2

87

21%

LEVEL 3

146

35%

LEVEL 4

131

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 428

LEVEL 1

69

16%

LEVEL 2

102

24%

LEVEL 3

143

33%

LEVEL 4

114

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

7

27%

LEVEL 4

9

35%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

16

47%

LEVEL 2

6

18%

LEVEL 3

10

29%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

295
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 402

LEVEL 1

29

7%

LEVEL 2

78

19%

LEVEL 3

147

37%

LEVEL 4

148

37%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

270
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

100

24%

LEVEL 3

151

36%

LEVEL 4

119

28%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

37

49%

LEVEL 2

25

33%

LEVEL 3

13

17%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

44

60%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

280
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

93

19%

LEVEL 2

118

24%

LEVEL 3

159

32%

LEVEL 4

121

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

248
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 347

LEVEL 1

30

9%

LEVEL 2

69

20%

LEVEL 3

122

35%

LEVEL 4

126

36%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

231
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 359

LEVEL 1

47

13%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

102

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

36

27%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

38

29%

LEVEL 4

23

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

50

36%

LEVEL 2

38

28%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.