500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

PINEHURST ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

49

16%

LEVEL 2

103

33%

LEVEL 3

113

36%

LEVEL 4

51

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

172
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 295

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

83

28%

LEVEL 3

123

42%

LEVEL 4

49

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

12

9%

LEVEL 2

41

30%

LEVEL 3

58

42%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

92
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

34

25%

LEVEL 3

58

43%

LEVEL 4

34

25%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

37

21%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

24

13%

MALE

PROFICIENT

80
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

30

19%

LEVEL 2

49

31%

LEVEL 3

65

41%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

160
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

45

15%

LEVEL 2

92

31%

LEVEL 3

110

37%

LEVEL 4

50

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

168
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

35

12%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

121

43%

LEVEL 4

47

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

1

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

96

34%

LEVEL 3

112

39%

LEVEL 4

50

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

25

9%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

119

44%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

22

71%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

147
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

39

15%

LEVEL 2

80

30%

LEVEL 3

100

38%

LEVEL 4

47

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

152
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

105

42%

LEVEL 4

47

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

10

20%

LEVEL 2

23

46%

LEVEL 3

13

26%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

15

35%

LEVEL 3

18

42%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.