500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ORCHARD PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 20, 2017 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 and 2017 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2016

2017

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

264
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

78

14%

LEVEL 2

212

38%

LEVEL 3

167

30%

LEVEL 4

97

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

261
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

225

41%

LEVEL 3

165

30%

LEVEL 4

96

17%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

115
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

40

15%

LEVEL 2

107

41%

LEVEL 3

77

29%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

108

41%

LEVEL 3

80

31%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

149
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 292

LEVEL 1

38

13%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

90

31%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

133
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 287

LEVEL 1

37

13%

LEVEL 2

117

41%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

48

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

2

17%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

252
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 517

LEVEL 1

68

13%

LEVEL 2

197

38%

LEVEL 3

156

30%

LEVEL 4

96

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

244
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

59

11%

LEVEL 2

212

41%

LEVEL 3

156

30%

LEVEL 4

88

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

7

54%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

7

47%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

3

20%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

35

7%

LEVEL 2

186

39%

LEVEL 3

165

34%

LEVEL 4

95

20%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

253
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

195

41%

LEVEL 3

157

33%

LEVEL 4

96

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

43

59%

LEVEL 2

26

36%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

36

49%

LEVEL 2

30

41%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

255
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

66

13%

LEVEL 2

187

37%

LEVEL 3

160

31%

LEVEL 4

95

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

244
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

53

11%

LEVEL 2

205

41%

LEVEL 3

153

30%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

12

26%

LEVEL 2

25

54%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

10

21%

LEVEL 2

20

43%

LEVEL 3

12

26%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.