500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

ELLICOTT ROAD ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 322

LEVEL 1

42

13%

LEVEL 2

133

41%

LEVEL 3

114

35%

LEVEL 4

33

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 297

LEVEL 1

34

11%

LEVEL 2

117

39%

LEVEL 3

106

36%

LEVEL 4

40

13%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

67

43%

LEVEL 3

55

35%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

90
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 150

LEVEL 1

14

9%

LEVEL 2

46

31%

LEVEL 3

64

43%

LEVEL 4

26

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

26

16%

LEVEL 2

66

40%

LEVEL 3

59

36%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

20

14%

LEVEL 2

71

48%

LEVEL 3

42

29%

LEVEL 4

14

10%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

143
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

38

12%

LEVEL 2

126

41%

LEVEL 3

110

36%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

139
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

111

39%

LEVEL 3

100

35%

LEVEL 4

39

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

21

8%

LEVEL 2

114

41%

LEVEL 3

111

40%

LEVEL 4

30

11%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

140
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

17

7%

LEVEL 2

100

39%

LEVEL 3

100

39%

LEVEL 4

40

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

21

46%

LEVEL 2

19

41%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

3

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

17

43%

LEVEL 2

17

43%

LEVEL 3

6

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

39

13%

LEVEL 2

125

40%

LEVEL 3

112

36%

LEVEL 4

33

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

146
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 286

LEVEL 1

27

9%

LEVEL 2

113

40%

LEVEL 3

106

37%

LEVEL 4

40

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

8

62%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.