500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

MALONE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

234

48%

LEVEL 2

201

41%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

159

46%

LEVEL 2

126

37%

LEVEL 3

50

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

28
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

116

47%

LEVEL 2

105

42%

LEVEL 3

22

9%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

64

40%

LEVEL 2

59

37%

LEVEL 3

32

20%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

29
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

118

49%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

27

11%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

95

52%

LEVEL 2

67

36%

LEVEL 3

18

10%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

55
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 468

LEVEL 1

223

48%

LEVEL 2

190

41%

LEVEL 3

47

10%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

56
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

152

46%

LEVEL 2

121

37%

LEVEL 3

48

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

144

37%

LEVEL 2

193

49%

LEVEL 3

49

12%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

96

35%

LEVEL 2

117

43%

LEVEL 3

50

18%

LEVEL 4

8

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

90

92%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

63

88%

LEVEL 2

9

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

108

49%

LEVEL 3

28

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

71

45%

LEVEL 3

30

19%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

157

58%

LEVEL 2

93

34%

LEVEL 3

21

8%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

106

57%

LEVEL 2

55

30%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

57
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 475

LEVEL 1

221

47%

LEVEL 2

197

41%

LEVEL 3

49

10%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

57
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

154

46%

LEVEL 2

122

37%

LEVEL 3

49

15%

LEVEL 4

8

2%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

13

76%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.