500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

GLOVERSVILLE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

121
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

320

48%

LEVEL 2

231

34%

LEVEL 3

98

15%

LEVEL 4

23

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

149
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 714

LEVEL 1

318

45%

LEVEL 2

247

35%

LEVEL 3

102

14%

LEVEL 4

47

7%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 314

LEVEL 1

157

50%

LEVEL 2

114

36%

LEVEL 3

34

11%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

156

46%

LEVEL 2

120

35%

LEVEL 3

47

14%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

78
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

163

46%

LEVEL 2

117

33%

LEVEL 3

64

18%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 374

LEVEL 1

162

43%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

55

15%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

105
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 582

LEVEL 1

273

47%

LEVEL 2

204

35%

LEVEL 3

85

15%

LEVEL 4

20

3%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

127
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 623

LEVEL 1

273

44%

LEVEL 2

223

36%

LEVEL 3

86

14%

LEVEL 4

41

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

12

30%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

23

68%

LEVEL 2

8

24%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

13

50%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

3

12%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

13

41%

LEVEL 2

10

31%

LEVEL 3

7

22%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

119
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

180

35%

LEVEL 2

216

42%

LEVEL 3

96

19%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 555

LEVEL 1

181

33%

LEVEL 2

226

41%

LEVEL 3

101

18%

LEVEL 4

47

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

140

89%

LEVEL 2

15

10%

LEVEL 3

2

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

137

86%

LEVEL 2

21

13%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

53

34%

LEVEL 2

60

38%

LEVEL 3

35

22%

LEVEL 4

9

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

46

25%

LEVEL 2

76

41%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

22

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

77
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

267

52%

LEVEL 2

171

33%

LEVEL 3

63

12%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

87
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 530

LEVEL 1

272

51%

LEVEL 2

171

32%

LEVEL 3

62

12%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.