500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

KNOX JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

89

33%

LEVEL 2

110

41%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

95

37%

LEVEL 2

103

40%

LEVEL 3

47

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

40
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

61

47%

LEVEL 3

28

21%

LEVEL 4

12

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 114

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

49

43%

LEVEL 3

25

22%

LEVEL 4

10

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

30
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

59

43%

LEVEL 2

49

36%

LEVEL 3

25

18%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

25
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

65

45%

LEVEL 2

54

38%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 249

LEVEL 1

81

33%

LEVEL 2

103

41%

LEVEL 3

50

20%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

88

37%

LEVEL 2

96

40%

LEVEL 3

42

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

4

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

66

27%

LEVEL 2

107

44%

LEVEL 3

53

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

60
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

75

32%

LEVEL 2

100

43%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

23

88%

LEVEL 2

3

12%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

20

87%

LEVEL 2

3

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

27

19%

LEVEL 2

55

39%

LEVEL 3

43

31%

LEVEL 4

15

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

34

28%

LEVEL 2

45

37%

LEVEL 3

32

26%

LEVEL 4

12

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

12
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 129

LEVEL 1

62

48%

LEVEL 2

55

43%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

61

45%

LEVEL 2

58

43%

LEVEL 3

15

11%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.