500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH JEFFERSON CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the Common Core Learning Standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on data.nysed.gov are based on those reported to the State as of July 25, 2014 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS) and reflect unmatched data. results for students who participated in all test books in both 2013 and 2014 ("matched students") can be found on the . This matched approach displays the year-to-year results of the exact same students in 2013 and 2014.

The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2013

2014

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 839

LEVEL 1

263

31%

LEVEL 2

335

40%

LEVEL 3

187

22%

LEVEL 4

54

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 806

LEVEL 1

216

27%

LEVEL 2

315

39%

LEVEL 3

210

26%

LEVEL 4

65

8%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 443

LEVEL 1

136

31%

LEVEL 2

175

40%

LEVEL 3

106

24%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

150
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

113

27%

LEVEL 2

153

37%

LEVEL 3

117

28%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 396

LEVEL 1

127

32%

LEVEL 2

160

40%

LEVEL 3

81

20%

LEVEL 4

28

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

103

26%

LEVEL 2

162

42%

LEVEL 3

93

24%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

1
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

1

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

237
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 804

LEVEL 1

249

31%

LEVEL 2

318

40%

LEVEL 3

183

23%

LEVEL 4

54

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

271
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 785

LEVEL 1

208

26%

LEVEL 2

306

39%

LEVEL 3

206

26%

LEVEL 4

65

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

239
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

147

21%

LEVEL 2

312

45%

LEVEL 3

186

27%

LEVEL 4

53

8%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

268
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 658

LEVEL 1

101

15%

LEVEL 2

289

44%

LEVEL 3

204

31%

LEVEL 4

64

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

116

82%

LEVEL 2

23

16%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

115

78%

LEVEL 2

26

18%

LEVEL 3

6

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

180
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

96

22%

LEVEL 2

164

37%

LEVEL 3

140

32%

LEVEL 4

40

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

167

42%

LEVEL 2

171

43%

LEVEL 3

47

12%

LEVEL 4

14

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.