500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

SOUTH JEFFERSON CSD GRADES 3-8 ELA ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

184
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 692

LEVEL 1

247

36%

LEVEL 2

261

38%

LEVEL 3

153

22%

LEVEL 4

31

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

207
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 719

LEVEL 1

227

32%

LEVEL 2

285

40%

LEVEL 3

167

23%

LEVEL 4

40

6%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

118
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

106

30%

LEVEL 2

132

37%

LEVEL 3

100

28%

LEVEL 4

18

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

128
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

89

24%

LEVEL 2

151

41%

LEVEL 3

100

27%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

141

42%

LEVEL 2

129

38%

LEVEL 3

53

16%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

79
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

138

39%

LEVEL 2

134

38%

LEVEL 3

67

19%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

4

31%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

174
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 664

LEVEL 1

236

36%

LEVEL 2

254

38%

LEVEL 3

145

22%

LEVEL 4

29

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

196
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 690

LEVEL 1

217

31%

LEVEL 2

277

40%

LEVEL 3

160

23%

LEVEL 4

36

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 569

LEVEL 1

138

24%

LEVEL 2

250

44%

LEVEL 3

150

26%

LEVEL 4

31

5%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

205
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 589

LEVEL 1

122

21%

LEVEL 2

262

44%

LEVEL 3

165

28%

LEVEL 4

40

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

109

89%

LEVEL 2

11

9%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

105

81%

LEVEL 2

23

18%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

123
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 356

LEVEL 1

80

22%

LEVEL 2

153

43%

LEVEL 3

101

28%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

74

21%

LEVEL 2

157

44%

LEVEL 3

97

27%

LEVEL 4

27

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

61
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

167

50%

LEVEL 2

108

32%

LEVEL 3

52

15%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 364

LEVEL 1

153

42%

LEVEL 2

128

35%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.