500福利在线

Skip to Content
Main content

CARTHAGE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 18, 2016 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the

Due to changes in the 2016 exams, the proficiency rates from exams prior to 2016 are not directly comparable to the 2016 proficiency rates.

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2015

2016

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

189
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

251

34%

LEVEL 2

289

40%

LEVEL 3

134

18%

LEVEL 4

55

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

191
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

215

32%

LEVEL 2

270

40%

LEVEL 3

122

18%

LEVEL 4

69

10%

BY 500福利在线

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

112

32%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

70

20%

LEVEL 4

28

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

98
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

108

32%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

40

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

139

37%

LEVEL 2

145

39%

LEVEL 3

64

17%

LEVEL 4

27

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

93
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

107

31%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

64

19%

LEVEL 4

29

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

27

44%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

15

24%

LEVEL 2

30

48%

LEVEL 3

10

16%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 522

LEVEL 1

182

35%

LEVEL 2

202

39%

LEVEL 3

98

19%

LEVEL 4

40

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

149
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 476

LEVEL 1

154

32%

LEVEL 2

173

36%

LEVEL 3

92

19%

LEVEL 4

57

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

19

36%

LEVEL 2

22

42%

LEVEL 3

9

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

21

44%

LEVEL 2

21

44%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

14
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

25

35%

LEVEL 2

32

45%

LEVEL 3

8

11%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

21

28%

LEVEL 2

37

49%

LEVEL 3

14

19%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

186
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

138

24%

LEVEL 2

261

45%

LEVEL 3

131

22%

LEVEL 4

55

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

113

78%

LEVEL 2

28

19%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

134
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

92

25%

LEVEL 2

149

40%

LEVEL 3

92

25%

LEVEL 4

42

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

128
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

77

22%

LEVEL 2

140

41%

LEVEL 3

76

22%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

159

45%

LEVEL 2

140

40%

LEVEL 3

42

12%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

138

42%

LEVEL 2

130

39%

LEVEL 3

46

14%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.